Samsung Galaxy S III ( 21 Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy S3)

21 Reasons for the Samsung Galaxy S3

 

Also known as: Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III

power
Considerably more battery power	2,100mAh	vs	1,418mAh	49% more battery power 87%
Wireless charging	Yes	vs	No	It can be charged w/o any plugs and wires similar to electric shavers or toothbrushes (as extra)
Can be charged via standard USB cable	Yes	vs	No	It can be charged with a standard USB cable with your computer or with USB power supplies
Has a removable battery	Yes	vs	No	The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken
memory
Way more RAM memory	1.0GB	vs	0.5GB	0.5gb more RAM memory
camera
Noticeably more megapixel (photo, front camera)	1.9	vs	0.3	6.3x more megapixel (photo, front camera)
Has a serial shot mode	Yes	vs	No	You can shoot multiple pictures in a row
Has a built-in HDR mode	Yes	vs	No	It can automatically shoot pictures with an higher dynamic range (HDR)
physical
A shade thinner	8.6mm	vs	9.3mm	0.7mm thinner 88%
A little lighter	133.0g	vs	140.0g	7.0g lighter
connectivity
Has DLNA	Yes	vs	No	It can stream videos and movies to other devices over-the-air
Has an HDMI output	Yes	vs	No	Video and movies can be watched on a TV with HDMI input
Has NFC	Yes	vs	No	Near-field-communication (NFC) allows wireless transactions like payments
Clearly faster downloads	21.0MBits/s	vs	14.4MBits/s	46% faster downloads
Has a MicroSD slot	Yes	vs	No	Internal Storage can be extended with MicroSD cards
os
Has free navigation software	Yes	vs	No	Free navigation software with free map data and updates included, no need to buy an dedicated navigation device
Plays Adobe Flash	Yes	vs	No	Adobe Flash with Video and Sound is supported in the phone's browser
screen
Way bigger screen size	4.8"	vs	3.5"	37% bigger screen size 93%
Vastly higher screen resolution	720 x 1280 px	vs	640 x 960 px	1.5x higher screen resolution
cpu
Clearly faster CPU clock speed	4x 1.4Ghz	vs	2x 0.8Ghz	3.5x faster CPU clock speed
Considerably smaller semiconductor size/newer CPU Check Price Here	40nm	vs	45nm	11% smaller semiconductor size/newer CPU